Parents Plan To Appeal Boy Scout's Rejection Jane Dubovy and Mike Reilly claimed in their suit that Scout leaders with Troop 223 and the Western Los Angeles County Council of Boy Scouts of America violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and state laws when they kept Casey Reilly out of scouting activities and from advancing in rank. The parents filed the suit after Scout leaders told them that Casey could only attend a weeklong rite of passage if his father came along to supervise him. The parents said the requirement was one of several conditions that had made the scouting experience difficult for their son and other students with disabilities during Casey's four years in the Boy Scouts. Judge S. James Otero rejected the parents' argument that Boy Scouts of America cannot exclude boys with disabilities because its membership is open to all other boys. Otero said the organization is not an 'open' organization, and explained that it already excludes homosexuals and atheists, and therefore does not have to follow the ADA. The parents' lawyer told the Palisadian Post that Judge Otero 'misapplied' the ADA and 'went beyond what he is authorized to do.' Related: --- Reproduced here under special arrangement
with Inclusion Daily Express international disability rights news service. |

